Dans un monde où la civilisation s’est effondrée suite à une pandémie foudroyante, une troupe d’acteurs et de musiciens nomadise entre de petites communautés de survivants pour leur jouer du Shakespeare. Un répertoire qui en est venu à représenter l’espoir et l’humanité au milieu de la désolation.
This was recommended to me and I went in knowing very little about it.
I found it to be a really gripping novel; hard to put down. I was really excited to see how the characters lives intersected and how they handled the trauma of the devastating pandemic.
The book tells the story of the characters at various stages of their lives ranging from many years before the pandemic, to around 20 years after. This gives a really interesting perspective on the characters, and keeps the pace of the book fast and interesting.
Highly recommended!
This was recommended to me and I went in knowing very little about it.
I found it to be a really gripping novel; hard to put down. I was really excited to see how the characters lives intersected and how they handled the trauma of the devastating pandemic.
The book tells the story of the characters at various stages of their lives ranging from many years before the pandemic, to around 20 years after. This gives a really interesting perspective on the characters, and keeps the pace of the book fast and interesting.
This was recommended to me and I went in knowing very little about it.
I found it to be a really gripping novel; hard to put down. I was really excited to see how the characters lives intersected and how they handled the trauma of the devastating pandemic.
The book tells the story of the characters at various stages of their lives ranging from many years before the pandemic, to around 20 years after. This gives a really interesting perspective on the characters, and keeps the pace of the book fast and interesting.
Highly recommended!
This was recommended to me and I went in knowing very little about it.
I found it to be a really gripping novel; hard to put down. I was really excited to see how the characters lives intersected and how they handled the trauma of the devastating pandemic.
The book tells the story of the characters at various stages of their lives ranging from many years before the pandemic, to around 20 years after. This gives a really interesting perspective on the characters, and keeps the pace of the book fast and interesting.
There was a lot in this I really enjoyed. Interesting characters and a fascinating set of situations, all very tightly plotted and woven together in a system that slowly became visible throughout the novel. The structure and style of it has a lot of similarities to The Passage - something the book slyly acknowledges at one point. However, I can only give this four and not five stars because the ending - or, more accurately, the climactic point of the narrative - feels too short and brief, almost perfunctory in the way it happens. When I was getting towards the end, I was thinking that I'd missed something in the blurb and this was just the first book of a pair or a series. There was enough going on and being built up I couldn't see how it could be resolved in that space - and I'm not sure it …
There was a lot in this I really enjoyed. Interesting characters and a fascinating set of situations, all very tightly plotted and woven together in a system that slowly became visible throughout the novel. The structure and style of it has a lot of similarities to The Passage - something the book slyly acknowledges at one point. However, I can only give this four and not five stars because the ending - or, more accurately, the climactic point of the narrative - feels too short and brief, almost perfunctory in the way it happens. When I was getting towards the end, I was thinking that I'd missed something in the blurb and this was just the first book of a pair or a series. There was enough going on and being built up I couldn't see how it could be resolved in that space - and I'm not sure it was, leaving me a bit empty when it finished.
Ce roman est assez complexe à décrire ... On y assiste à une représentation du roi Lear. On y voit la vie de l'acteur principal y défiler. On y voit la vie d'une troupe musicale et théatrale ambulante s'y dérouler vingt après la fin du monde. On y comprend, peut-être, le sens que peut avoir l'art dans un monde ayant quasiment disparu. J'y ai également lu, malgré tout, la fragilité de notre mode de vie technologique, rendue justement par son impossible survie à la fin du monde. Une fragilité qui est peut-être le coeur de cette oeuvre. Pas parce que ces objets y sont importants. Au contraire, les personnages n'ont, globalement, que peu d'attrait pour ces objets. C'est - peut-être - ce qui facilite la survie des trop rares survivants. Par contre, la capacité à vouloir faire plus que survivre, comme le décrit particulièrement bien la troupe ambulante, est aussi …
Ce roman est assez complexe à décrire ... On y assiste à une représentation du roi Lear. On y voit la vie de l'acteur principal y défiler. On y voit la vie d'une troupe musicale et théatrale ambulante s'y dérouler vingt après la fin du monde. On y comprend, peut-être, le sens que peut avoir l'art dans un monde ayant quasiment disparu. J'y ai également lu, malgré tout, la fragilité de notre mode de vie technologique, rendue justement par son impossible survie à la fin du monde. Une fragilité qui est peut-être le coeur de cette oeuvre. Pas parce que ces objets y sont importants. Au contraire, les personnages n'ont, globalement, que peu d'attrait pour ces objets. C'est - peut-être - ce qui facilite la survie des trop rares survivants. Par contre, la capacité à vouloir faire plus que survivre, comme le décrit particulièrement bien la troupe ambulante, est aussi un des éléments clés de cette histoire : chaque humain semble avoir des aspirations plus grande que d'aller jusqu'au lendemain, des aspirations qui peuvent certes le tuer, mais qui sont de formidables ressorts de motivation. Ca rend d'ailleurs les personnages principaux vivants, réels. De ce point de vue, j'ai trouvé l’écriture d'une légèreté, d'une subtilité que j'avais rarement vue, sauf peut-être dans [b:Cloud Atlas : cartographie des nuages]. Ouvrage avec lequel il partage d'ailleurs un attachement à l'écrit : il s'agit ici d'une oeuvre auto-référente, puisque Station Eleven est, dans station Eleven, le titre d'une oeuvre fictionnelle ... qui rattache encore plus ce roman aux genres de l'imaginaire. Il y a bien d'autres choses à dire de ce roman, sur ce qu'il dit de la fragilité de nos existences - ou plutôt de notre mode de vie, sur l'insignifiance de l'existence. Mais tout cela est dit d'une façon tellement délicate, tellement légère, que j'ai du mal à en rendre compte. Alors que pourtant, j'ai apprécié ce récit, énormément même. Et franchement, vous apprécierez également, à moins que la fin du monde ne vous terrifie.
Beautiful book. In an interview, the author states that the first post-apocalyptic book she read in her youth was A Canticle for Leibowitz. I’m glad she said this, because that is the book (of my admittedly limited reading experience) that I thought of most often while reading Station Eleven. Both books do a nice job of playing with time and the strange and unexpected ways that events before the disaster affect life afterwards—the older book on a grand scale and the newer book in a more personal and relatable way. It’s also interesting to note the contrast in the roles of the two most notable religious institutions in each book: the Catholic Church in one and the Prophet’s group in the other. (One advantage Station Eleven has is its diversity, which includes actual female characters ... but maybe Canticle for Leibowitz would have done a better job in this regard …
Beautiful book. In an interview, the author states that the first post-apocalyptic book she read in her youth was A Canticle for Leibowitz. I’m glad she said this, because that is the book (of my admittedly limited reading experience) that I thought of most often while reading Station Eleven. Both books do a nice job of playing with time and the strange and unexpected ways that events before the disaster affect life afterwards—the older book on a grand scale and the newer book in a more personal and relatable way. It’s also interesting to note the contrast in the roles of the two most notable religious institutions in each book: the Catholic Church in one and the Prophet’s group in the other. (One advantage Station Eleven has is its diversity, which includes actual female characters ... but maybe Canticle for Leibowitz would have done a better job in this regard if it had been written today.)
Really the only downside for me was how the bulk of the main characters comprises actors and paparazzi and members of the jet set. Although the inclusion of modern conveniences like cell phones and the Internet and 24-hour news stations made the story hit close to home, the characters largely felt like they came from another world to start with. Still, for me it was an exciting book that I couldn’t wait to return to every day.
And, as others have noted, there was a hopefulness to the book, which I appreciated. While Arthur's story is a bit of a tragedy (especially for those associated with his son) and some characters do die, I am glad the book didn't feel the need to go into gruesome or lurid territory. I'm kinda hoping the filmmakers exercise the same restraint when this is adapted for the movies.