User Profile

Nibsy

Nibsy@bookrastinating.com

Joined 1 year, 5 months ago

My reading interests are broad and mostly non-fiction. I typically stick to topics related to nature, the environment, and science in general. However, lately I've taken an interest in cultural anthropology, history, and the sociological factors that are driving a growing mistrust in science, scientists, and scientific institutions. I have a couple of other accounts in the fediverse, which I've joined recently. But, as a reader (and recovering GR user), this little nook of the fediverse looked particularly interesting to me.

This link opens in a pop-up window

quoted The Petroleum Papers by Geoff Dembicki

Geoff Dembicki: The Petroleum Papers (Hardcover, 2022, Greystone Books Ltd.) 4 stars

In The Petroleum Papers, investigative journalist Geoff Dembicki tells the story of how the American …

Imperial [Oil] began an effort to make the carbon tax look reckless . . . Stopping climate change was not only possible but economically feasible, company leaders knew. But since taxing carbon would kill its profits in the oil sands, Imperial would make sure that this climate solution never happened.

The Petroleum Papers by  (Page 81)

This strategy was laid out in a 1993 internal document describing a deliberate disinformation campaign to Exxon executives. In the 30 years since, we haven't moved far beyond this.

Thomas M. Nichols: The Death of Expertise (2017) 4 stars

A cult of anti-expertise sentiment has coincided with anti-intellectualism, resulting in massively viral yet poorly …

The relationship between experts and citizens, like almost all relationships in a democracy, is built on trust. When that trust collapses, experts and laypeople become warring factions. And when that happens, democracy itself can enter a death spiral that presents an immediate danger of decay either into rule by the mob or toward elitist technocracy.

The Death of Expertise by  (85%)

Thomas M. Nichols: The Death of Expertise (2017) 4 stars

A cult of anti-expertise sentiment has coincided with anti-intellectualism, resulting in massively viral yet poorly …

Democracy cannot function when every citizen is an expert. Yes, it is unbridled ego for experts to believe they can run a democracy while ignoring its voters; it is also, however, ignorant narcissism for laypeople to believe that they can maintain a large and advanced nation without listening to the voices of these more educated and experienced than themselves.

The Death of Expertise by  (83%)

Thomas M. Nichols: The Death of Expertise (2017) 4 stars

A cult of anti-expertise sentiment has coincided with anti-intellectualism, resulting in massively viral yet poorly …

The modern media, with so many options tailored to particular views, is a huge exercise in confirmation bias. This means that Americans are not just poorly informed, they're misinformed.

The Death of Expertise by  (63%)

Emphasis in the original.

Barbara F. Walter: How Civil Wars Start (Hardcover, 2022, Crown) 5 stars

The influence of modern life on the civil wars, with an emphasis on grievance, faction …

Too Close for Comfort

5 stars

Democracy has been in decline around the world for the last several years, as the ascendance of the far-right, including Jair Bolsonaro in Brazil, Marine La Pen in France, the AfD in Germany, and Donald Trump in the United States, has made clear. The health of any democracy can be measured objectively using a polity score, which determines if a country is an autocracy (low polity score), a democracy (high polity score), or an anocracy—something between an autocracy and a democracy. Since Donald Trump was elected in 2016, the polity score for the United States has been in a state of steady decline. After the January 6, 2021 insurrection on the U.S. Capitol, the polity score dropped sufficiently for the U.S. to be recategorized as an anocracy. That means that the United States is no longer the longest-standing continuous democracy. That title now belongs to Switzerland, followed by New Zealand …